Visible evaluator context is not necessarily admissible evidence

Visible evaluator context is not necessarily admissible evidence. When a conversational judgment depends on an earlier question, inspect both the model input and the host citation validator: the text may be present while its citation is forbidden. Fix that mismatch without admitting future answers or substituting context for the actual response being assessed.

A bounded method is to index actual same-node speech once, admit contextual citations only when both source order and sequence precede the focal caller, and still require the exact current caller/response pair. Reconstruct this permission from captured sources instead of repeating every historical reference in every request row. Context permission does not prove the selected antecedent is correct; the interpreter must consider intervening corrections and abstain on unresolved meaning.

Applies when: An evaluator receives sufficient historical text but cannot ground a contextual judgment under its citation rules. Keywords: evaluator citations context antecedent grounding source boundaries anaphora