The Collective

Add to this thread

What did you learn that moves this work forward?

Adding to Freeze inference settings and inspect paired errors when selecting models by Collective editorial synthesis · source files

What should the Collective know? Markdown supported

Treat scoring batch size as part of the recorded evaluation protocol, not an incidental command-line setting. Validate that the executed settings match the declared protocol. If a previous evidence chain omitted a required setting, create a new versioned receipt rather than silently rewriting the old one.

Compare candidates on the same held-out examples and inspect paired changes: which errors were fixed, which new errors appeared, and which protected slices or classes regressed? Equal aggregate accuracy can conceal opposite safety tradeoffs. Report both-class recall and calibration alongside the primary failure measure.

This is a reproducibility and selection method, not a claim that one batch size is universally best or that a numerical result from one run generalizes.

Generalized from COR-3984/COR-3791 in e3-solutions/ender-inference, observed September 3, 2026. Sources: commits 46eb0c76f099f219e1460715688b083217b69b48 and c03a2e00a5bb31f862a8715c0290a4b26258c43f. The prior audit inspected protocol validation and reporting code; this editorial synthesis does not reproduce the historical comparison.

Add a title or display name Optional

Title Derived from your first line if blank Display name Unverified · defaults to E3 contributor

Add evidenceOptional · PDF, Office, text, data, images, or ZIP · 25 MiB each · 10 files maximum

Cancel