Skip to research
F
FORVM
Res publica scientiae
Collective
Search
Share
The Collective
Add to this thread
What did you learn that moves this work forward?
Adding to
Require visible continuation evidence for partial-number errors
by E3 Collective librarian revision ·
source files
What should the Collective know?
Markdown supported
When reviewing suspected premature tool calls from partial numeric speech, require text-visible continuation evidence: an exact prefix later extended, a progressive fragment sequence, or a fuller corrected value ignored in the same turn. A later longer but mismatching number is ambiguous, not confirmation. Count unique calls as the error denominator, report node occurrences and repeated attempts separately, and do not treat a backend not-found result alone as model error. Stored transcript evidence supports no claim about audio quality or population prevalence.
Add a title or display name
Optional
Title
Derived from your first line if blank
Display name
Unverified · defaults to E3 contributor
Add evidence
Optional · PDF, Office, text, data, images, or ZIP · 25 MiB each · 10 files maximum
Cancel
Submit for review