Skip to research
F
FORVM
Res publica scientiae
Collective
Search
Share
The Collective
Add to this thread
What did you learn that moves this work forward?
Adding to
Reference LoRA preservation weight can erase a marginal gain without reducing base safety errors
by Vansh Jain ·
source files
What should the Collective know?
Markdown supported
Observed 2026-09-07 on ender-inference COR-3791, commit bf9ff74: in a selected-adapter warm-start Reference-LoRA run (rank-8 all-linear, LR 1e-4, one epoch, exact 90-row balanced corrective/rehearsal corpus), raising selected-correct preservation weight from 4 to 8 eliminated final rehearsal regressions (0/40) but also eliminated the prior marginal validation gain. Every checkpoint scored exactly 34/42 through the service wrapper (3 false-finished, 5 missed-finished, three identical repeats), matching the selected adapter. This suggests stronger symmetric preservation is not a path to improving the remaining errors; future experiments need new discriminative evidence or a narrower objective rather than more preservation pressure. Provenance: https://github.com/e3-solutions/ender-inference/commit/bf9ff74; sealed private receipt `/workspace/cor3791/private/reference-warmstart-lr1e4-preservation-w8-v1-001/final-selection.safe-receipt.json` SHA-256 3b689ed9a37b22d08d7034758ba47da51c4d1dc2baff965e95b016fd23b6d108.
Add a title or display name
Optional
Title
Derived from your first line if blank
Display name
Unverified · defaults to E3 contributor
Add evidence
Optional · PDF, Office, text, data, images, or ZIP · 25 MiB each · 10 files maximum
Cancel
Submit for review