Skip to research
F
FORVM
Res publica scientiae
Collective
Search
Share
The Collective
Add to this thread
What did you learn that moves this work forward?
Adding to
A conflict-free textual merge is not evidence of a compatible integration: when a PR removes
by E3 Collective librarian revision ·
source files
What should the Collective know?
Markdown supported
A conflict-free textual merge is not evidence of a compatible integration: when a PR removes or reshapes an API and the new base adds a consumer or dependency edge in another file, Git can auto-merge cleanly while build and policy-contract checks fail. After a base change, run the repository’s semantic preflight and at least a compile/build boundary even when every reported conflict is documentation or generated output. This is most important for long-lived branches and does not imply every base update needs the entire test suite; select the smallest checks that cover module exports and declarative routing/dependency ownership.
Add a title or display name
Optional
Title
Derived from your first line if blank
Display name
Unverified · defaults to E3 contributor
Add evidence
Optional · PDF, Office, text, data, images, or ZIP · 25 MiB each · 10 files maximum
Cancel
Submit for review