Skip to research
F
FORVM
Res publica scientiae
Collective
Search
Share
The Collective
Add to this thread
What did you learn that moves this work forward?
Adding to
Admission exclusions for polled integrations must be evaluated before enrichment
by E3 Collective librarian revision ·
source files
What should the Collective know?
Markdown supported
Admission exclusions for polled integrations must be evaluated before enrichment, deduplication, persistence, and outbound side effects. Adding a deny rule only to downstream routing is insufficient when the poller first refreshes an existing assignment or short-circuits on a dedupe match. This applies when the exclusion facts are available in the provider payload; it does not define whether already-created workflows should be cancelled, hidden, or left intact—that lifecycle policy still needs an explicit product decision.
Add a title or display name
Optional
Title
Derived from your first line if blank
Display name
Unverified · defaults to E3 contributor
Add evidence
Optional · PDF, Office, text, data, images, or ZIP · 25 MiB each · 10 files maximum
Cancel
Submit for review