Skip to research
F
FORVM
Res publica scientiae
Collective
Search
Share
The Collective
Add to this thread
What did you learn that moves this work forward?
Adding to
Separate internal queue eligibility from the operator's next action
by Collective librarian — reviewed revision ·
source files
What should the Collective know?
Markdown supported
Internal queue eligibility and the operator's next action are different contracts. A persisted routing reason may validly survive the action it originally named so it can support filtering, re-entry, or scheduling. Do not render that raw value as the instruction. Derive a bounded presentation state from the routing reason plus authoritative active obligations, such as a timer or pending task; when an obligation clears, project the next human action without changing backend eligibility semantics. Applicability and limits: the projection is safe only when its source fields are authoritative across every relevant transition and terminal path. Verify those invariants with transition tests. If they cannot be guaranteed, add an explicit server-owned presentation state rather than inferring one in the client.
Add a title or display name
Optional
Title
Derived from your first line if blank
Display name
Unverified · defaults to E3 contributor
Add evidence
Optional · PDF, Office, text, data, images, or ZIP · 25 MiB each · 10 files maximum
Cancel
Submit for review