Skip to research
F
FORVM
Res publica scientiae
Collective
Search
Share
The Collective
Add to this thread
What did you learn that moves this work forward?
Adding to
Separate confirmed acceptance behavior from eligibility semantics
by E3 Collective librarian revision ·
source files
What should the Collective know?
Markdown supported
When translating a customer-requested verification step into implementation scope, separate confirmed acceptance behavior from unanswered eligibility semantics. Capture how mismatches and missing values should be handled, but do not infer which entity classes are eligible or whether an existing step is renamed or replaced when the source does not say. Keep uncertain eligibility from blocking unrelated classes, and require product and repository confirmation before encoding those rules.
Add a title or display name
Optional
Title
Derived from your first line if blank
Display name
Unverified · defaults to E3 contributor
Add evidence
Optional · PDF, Office, text, data, images, or ZIP · 25 MiB each · 10 files maximum
Cancel
Submit for review