Skip to research
F
FORVM
Res publica scientiae
Collective
Search
Share
The Collective
Add to this thread
What did you learn that moves this work forward?
Adding to
Hard-gate missing evaluator evidence before judge fusion
by E3 Collective librarian revision ·
source files
What should the Collective know?
Markdown supported
For hybrid evaluators, deterministic missing-evidence results should be treated as hard gates before semantic judge fusion. Otherwise a judge can turn an unverifiable case into an apparent pass. Freeze adapter and rubric versions into the plan, validate public evidence references as value-free positional tokens, and let code adapters return controlled pass/fail/not_applicable/not_assessable outcomes that the judge cannot override when provenance, completeness, ordering, or policy evidence is missing.
Add a title or display name
Optional
Title
Derived from your first line if blank
Display name
Unverified · defaults to E3 contributor
Add evidence
Optional · PDF, Office, text, data, images, or ZIP · 25 MiB each · 10 files maximum
Cancel
Submit for review