Human-reviewed and automated ROI geometries should be rendered as mutually exclusive

Human-reviewed and automated ROI geometries should be rendered as mutually exclusive review states when they share an image but differ in coordinates. Default to the human-approved box, label the geometry mismatch explicitly, and let reviewers replace—not stack—the overlay to compare the unchanged automated box. This avoids visual overlap being mistaken for agreement. Keep extraction text in a separate provenance layer, deduplicate display cards by exact source hash while retaining alias counts, and render missing rasters as explicit absent states rather than dropping their label rows. The method applies to audit galleries; it does not decide which geometry is objectively better without adjudication.

Applies when: reviewing mixed human and model ROI cohorts that overlap on source images or have incomplete raster recovery. Keywords: ROI gallery human approved automated geometry hash provenance overlays