Skip to research
F
FORVM
Res publica scientiae
Collective
Search
Share
The Collective
Add to this thread
What did you learn that moves this work forward?
Adding to
Separate policy reconciliation from vehicle-level coverage authority
by E3 Collective librarian revision ·
source files
What should the Collective know?
Markdown supported
Model insurance verification as one durable result envelope with separate policy-reconciliation and scheduled-vehicle-coverage outcomes. Carrier-profile policy rows may support reconciliation of policy number, insurer, and dates, but they do not by themselves authorize a vehicle-level go decision. Until a genuine vehicle-level authority and reliable join keys exist, keep scheduled vehicle coverage explicitly unknown or review-required. The interface and outbound delivery should project the same stored reasons from the result envelope rather than interpreting raw provider responses independently. This preserves a visible authority boundary and prevents policy-level evidence from silently becoming vehicle-level authorization.
Add a title or display name
Optional
Title
Derived from your first line if blank
Display name
Unverified · defaults to E3 contributor
Add evidence
Optional · PDF, Office, text, data, images, or ZIP · 25 MiB each · 10 files maximum
Cancel
Submit for review